Hot Woman Wearing Stockings

There is freedom and freedom to stop and think

Being free does not mean doing what you want. Or rather, not to be confused with the freedom to say and make mistakes in our picimento. The web is becoming the size of a huge landfill where intellectual, whoever has the will, he feels entitled to write and post anything in violation of the principles which govern the basis of the concept of state. Last shameful example of this freedom that the Internet users think they have (for whatever form of law) relates to the garbage-related Facebook groups praising to Tartaglia. To understand

where is the flaw, we need to fully understand the concept of state. But what is the state? Max Weber wrote, "an institutional political system in which administrative steps forward with a successful claim to a monopoly of legitimate force of coercion in order to implement the regulations." In other words, every citizen must give up a slice of their liberty (the use of force for example) to decline for the community.

In short, we can not say what you want. This does not decline as an infringement of the constitutional principle in defense of freedom of thought, but it certainly raises the stakes in that speech. A constitutional expert would say that every single is free to express themselves as they like, but not to affect the sexual morals or dignity of others.

This point seems clear, yet it still sounds very strange to me, is the set of Marco Travaglio Beppe Grillo's Blog. Between the two no longer understand who the comedian or a journalist, however, you place the part of the article that I would like to submit (it is a huge integral text can see on the site). Travaglio writes as if he were justified, and that says a lot after heavy accusations addressed by the right-wing press over the past two days:

policy does not include the category of feeling
Look, I arrive at a paradoxical thing to say that of course will be used against me, but I do not care at all: he has already written Massimo Fini spanerse times, which speaks to this category of political hatred is a category of feeling that is applied to politics, politics and the feeling is not c 'enter anything, politics is a technical matter, so we vote for you to do things, but you can not ask me to love you, you can ask me to vote you, but I ask you to love, there's love' elector for his service, there is only in dictatorships, just when the charismatic populist leader manages to attract the love of the voters, who are not citizens, are its subjects, are another What are uncritical, are sheep who worship the capo.Il that has returned the category of hate and then love in the comments of the newspapers - read the nonsense you write today Battista Il Corriere della Sera on the climate of hatred etc. etc. - It should respond, as Massimo Fini, "and 'mbe? Who said I can not hate a politician? Who said I can not hope that it goes away! Who said I can not hope that the Creator take him away as soon as possible? ", Look at this thing here, which seems horrific, says," Oh God, is there anyone who hates him! ", Is absolutely normal: each to his home in his heart is free of hate and love who they like and there is no democracy in which citizens are obliged to love those who govern them, because if you love a person loses the critical spirit and the voters must always maintain a spirit critical. So leviamoci headed this blackmail, that we should not hate and we must love those who govern us, or that should be respected, but why should I respect someone who insults everyone, myself included, inter alia, continuously for fifteen years ? It 'important to this: the utterly condemned the attack and steadfast to say that these things should not be made and who makes them must be punished and at the same time, say "I'm the one there do not want to see, that guy I do not want him as prime minister, that does not represent me, hope it goes quickly from Palazzo Chigi, "these things are things .. or "hate him, hate him," I personally do not hate him, but I do not see why anyone could not hate him but the important thing is that it limits him to hate him without any harm, there is no hate crime, there is crime of violence, aggression, injury, attempted murder, murder, those are crimes, but hate crime does not exist, tell someone 'I hate you "is not a crime, God willing, but otherwise in a system, we would be in Belarus, a country to another by recently identified as a model of democracy by our Prime Minister on a visit to Lukashenko, where he said "the people you love and then you're right there," you see how dictatorships are born? Born in the mind of the dictator or the aspiring dictator, well before the minds of citizens, or rather of his subjects. So is there anything wrong with what they say Rosi Bindi, who said it best, and Antonio Di Pietro, who said in a more rickety, that in defining the victim of the attack shameful, we all condemn, etc. ., a known provocateur, that if one goes looking for? There is nothing strange to say such a thing is in the biography the Prime Minister, is in his DNA, I think that in some moment of clarity - every now and then he will - certainly admit in his heart, to be a great challenge: doing it on purpose, if not a provocateur and would not would not say all the things he says and does, do not take it every single day with all the courts that there are around the world, except probably Forums Channel Five, do not take it with the Constitution, did not take with the Constitutional Court, did not they take it all with whom he is angry, including those that do not exist and that only he sees, like all these plots the opposition, in short, just look at the faces of the opposition, to realize that, even if they wanted, would not be able to make any conspiracy, but not even want to do so and we are calm. He is a great challenge and some of its allies worse of him, imagine what's wrong in saying that these guys lead the country for fifteen years, when we heard a minister talk like Bossi rifles, Kalashnikovs, 200 / 300. 000 armed men in the valleys are ready to pick up their rifles and march for independence and secession, but these things we remember them or not! Some never occurred to these gentlemen by the language attributed to any violent incident of violence happened in their valley? Just think of the violence that Berlusconi has sown over the years, is perhaps the politician most violent we've ever seen in the history of the Republic and Italian: "Be reminded of any prime minister, as De Gasperi, Moro, Andreotti, who were all, at least in language, they were rather tame. And 'the politician that there was more violent in the history of the Republic and therefore say it is a provocateur and that is prepared in exciting the minds of a possible imbalance seems to me absolutely trivial, so I do not understand what the problem is in what they said Bindi and Di Pietro, who otherwise would have both stated that, of course, condemned the attack human solidarity and gave the prime minister, who remains a provocative even if they pulled a Madonna face, because just read his speeches and makes it a perfect bill.

We are therefore free to hate and hope that someone might die in a hurry? I read that right? Dear readers ... I just do not convince. Much better interventions Baptist (mistreated by Labor), Calabresi and Mauro Stella.

Nerf Gun Birthdya Party Invites

And eventually the blows came in earnest. Thank goodness it was just a punch, but after 24 hours, the time is for compassion, we will start the battle to establish any moral responsibility for what happened. Well, the Pennivendolo is called out of this logic, because here you will point the finger at anyone. Let's say that it is in my interest to rail against the whole system that has transformed the political struggle in a visceral issue, he jumped on a personal level, making it reason to rage just like a private quarrel between vicni home. Your dog makes me on the mat? I'll kill you. I kill the dog? I'll cut the tires of the car and away in the whirlwind of madness.

The above is hyperbole, but differs little from reality. Gian Paolo Pansa has reason to remember a season that has delusional Italy already experienced during the years of lead, when it was enough to finish in first page of a newspaper to be shot in the legs or done as an enemy of the people were infected. The tone of the political struggle are mad: on the one hand there is an attack on all the institutional structures, the other the desire to destroy Berlusconi's personal political subject, and then came the third part: the fools who think that political struggle could be resolved with blows of Madonna. This is just crazy, the people affected, in therapy, but never as now there is urgent need to open the history books and start reading a bit '. Probably most people do not know who was Rudi Dütsch (photo). Well, I told the Pennivendolo as an opportunity to get thinking.

Rudi was a German student who in 1963 joined the group and all subversive Aktion 'SDS, the German socialist students' organization. Dutschke quickly became the leader of the anti-authoritarian organization. They called Rudy the red, everything Marx and Mao, more determined than ever to create havoc within the bourgeois and entrepreneurial West Germany in the late sixties. But something did not work. Against the Rudy red unleashed a veritable media campaign led by newspapers controlled by Axel Springer (German publisher object of the aims of revolutionary Dütsch), who headlines "Stop Dutschke now!". Eventually someone thought Rudi really stop. A tappeziere exalted and psychologically unstable, Joseph Bachmann, taken Lettra the invitation and the April 11, 1968 fired three shots at Rudi. Dütsch did not die but suffered serious brain problems for the attack for a lifetime. He died in 1979 following a seizure while she was swimming.

Time: is not it time to moderate the tone? The only thing I know for certain is that a madman ready to pull the trigger is not something hard to find.

Legal Power Of Attorney Templates

The Nobel hypocrisy

"There is a just war." What news, how to support their discovery of the hot water. Yet the announcement by Mr. President, the world seems to have received the light of the oracle of Delphi. Think about what would have happened if he had been saying the same thing George W. Bush. Other than the popular uprising and down with flags and swastikas on banding. The great shaman has done it, he has cheated all of us and has mesmerized as a bunch of idiot we drink of his nonsense as the Sacred Source of eternal youth. So, years later, we all agree that the war in Afghanistan is sacred and holy, as well as white phosphorus in Iraq and the bullets are not so terrible. And why? Only to legitimize her beautiful big face and withdraws its fake.

It has been said that what Mr. President was a Nobel's intentions, hopes. Bei concepts that were proven wrong by sending 30 thousand other troops in the Middle East. If I remember correctly, always on the intentions and prevention, the Bush administration launched the concept of aberrant pre-emptive war. Is it not the same logical framework that today gives birth to Nobel estimate? We have found a new intellectual product "Made in the USA"-style Mentadent: prevention is better than cure. I just do not want to be sheep enough to berm this farce. I say no to Mr. President and his wife (who is like parsley on any catwalk in all American TV. But someone has ever voted?), I say no to bales passed off as a lesson in international politics. I'm sorry Mr. President, are not enough idiot to believe that after all is so different from its predecessor. The world thinks I'm not.

public, I always thought that the war in the Middle East conflict would take away from our house, and they did. For this, however, gave me the imperialist warmonger. But now what happened? The war is a concept pop? No longer an exclusive ugliness of the world right? It is no longer the worst of evils associated with delirious violence call human nature? Mr. President explained to me why his appearance at the Academy of Nobel threw me into confusion. Many colleagues in the pages the newspapers seem to have understood everything, I'm a bit 'less. It seems that the guns in Iraq should leave the flowers now.

last thing: if she really was the man of change, that award of the board refused risparmaindoci all the hypocrisy of the ceremony in Oslo.

Chronotherm Iv Plus Install Diagram

Who benefits?

In the seventies, before the bodies of the terrorist massacres, extra-parliamentary left stroking the goatee maverick he used to ask: "But all this, who benefits?". In that climate of political and social confusion, the question brought out the best way on the columns of the press and alternative counter: are the Secret Service, the CIA, the Russians and so on and so forth. Trying to understand what is happening today in the majority, including a disgruntled Fini and Berlusconi pissed off, I think asking the question "who benefits?" more likely to be a good key for interpretation. While the prime minister if he flies to Panama, Italy remains the echo of the last statements of Fini (useless to pretend) is now an element of opposition within the PDL. We do not enter the merits if the PDL to be a feud Berlusconi or copy the success of the Democratic Party, this is not what interests me for now. It 's definitely more important, in the middle of this crossfire, being able to understand who is benefiting. I say this now for the avoidance of misunderstandings: I am not Fini, nor Berlusconi.

From Desert Fox Member, who this time seems to have understood everything that Casini, closer to Berlusconi, has sensed that can benefit from this war. When the going gets tough the tough start to play and also is aware that Bossi, Fini burned, the key ally of Cavaiere will definitely him.

So the challenge is there and it moves between those who would like to weigh more and more, Bossi, and who is gone and now wants to return, Casini. We'll see, but one thing is certain: Fini alone can not go anywhere and the PDL will get back to the table to reopen discussion on the future of structure of the party. Behind the struggle, who will play the game in the shadow of the future balances and alliances, will be her boss and Casini.